What Does 4 Agreements Mean
I interpreted “is” as living in the present and “was” the representation of past behaviors. Tension change probably intentionally. The best way to develop knowledge is to bypass other evaluations and read the material and develop your own knowledge. Because I also look at topics in relation to me My opinion is that we all get something different from any book, based on completely different emotional reactions, based on the observations of a group that reads all four chords at the same time. There were about 50 of them, and I recommended it to a brother and sister who had a childhood trauma. He read the first chapters in tears, but he understood the healing power in himself. The first one only me off, but I understood that he was drawing why we shouldn`t believe that way. Be immaculate with your word. Don`t take anything personal. Don`t make any assumptions. Always do your best. The light and the truth.
The structure of the four chords is like an oreo: the chords are wedged between spiritual leadership and thought. At the beginning of the book, Ruiz begins with a Toltec mythology and the introduction of the term “the dream of the world”: it is an important condition for understanding the meaning of the chords themselves. The first chord seems simple. But he understands a few different notions. Literally, it means “sinless.” Don Miguel Ruiz invites us to be in our sinless words, as the first way to replace our old chords with new ones. Both the words we speak to each other and the words we say to others. When we love ourselves, we use friendly words for ourselves, instead of committing the “sin” of acting against yourself. We take responsibility for our actions, but we are not guilty. When we love others, we will not applaud or speak badly of them, but we share our common humanity. If it were not clear before, I will make it clear that I am not interested in being an apologist for Don Miguel Ruiz or having debates about his intentions.
My question of whether feelings guide judgments was rhetorical, and I do not expect an answer, because psychological research has already answered this question for me. Emotions may not be an important part of simple perception judgments, such as. B if the word “was” has been replaced by “east.” (Although in fact, sometimes emotions also influence simple perceptions.) But emotions are always involved in judgments of meaning, meaning, meaning and intent. My feeling is that Ruiz was not ashamed of it by replacing “what” with “is.” I could be wrong. But I also think it`s not important enough to continue to discuss other things that I have on the agenda. How do we know the correct interpretation of Ruiz`s reference to John 1:1-5? We could break one of its four agreements and make the assumption of its intent. Or if you`re really interested in the truth, you might ask him. I think it is certain that we should propose that we approve; Convictions should be tested constantly, otherwise they cannot be trusted. However, I will not agree with the idea that you have to follow all roads that are not regulated and do everything they “feel” is happy.